鈥沦补苍聽Francisco believes that composting is truly the highest and best use of organic material,鈥� said Debbie Raphael, director of the San Francisco Department of the Environment. 鈥淭丑别se new laws create a path for California cities to get valuable material out of the landfill and move toward zero waste. I commend all of the stakeholders who made this landmark legislation possible.鈥�
鈥淏y signing AB 1826 and AB 1594 into law, Governor Brown ensured that all of California shares in the environmental, agricultural, and economic benefits of organics recycling with reduced local emissions of greenhouse gases, new jobs and valuable compost for our farms and vineyards,鈥� said Mike聽Sangiacomo, President & CEO of Recology.
鈥淭丑别聽passage of AB 1594, together with AB 1826, represents the most important recycling legislation since the enactment of AB 939 in 1989 that made recycling commonplace in California,鈥� said PaulRelis Senior Vice President for CR&R Environmental Services. 鈥淭丑别聽new legislation will stimulate a whole new renewable energy industry in our state. 聽This industry will convert much of the seven million tons a year of organic waste going to landfills into 聽renewable natural gas ( some six times cleaner than natural gas), to power thousands of trucks and buses, and renewable electricity to power thousands of homes and businesses. 聽In addition to advancing renewable energy, this legislation will produce a wide range of soil products that will enrich California鈥檚 depleting soils while conserving precious water resources.鈥�
鈥淚t never made much sense to allow jurisdictions to receive recycling credits for using greenwaste 鈥� such as yard clippings 鈥� as a daily cover at the top of the landfill,鈥� said Darby聽Hoover, Senior Resource Specialist for the Natural Resources Defense Council. 鈥淏y聽reclassifying greenwaste daily cover as disposal, not recycling, the State will actually incentivize better, smarter uses of greenwaste. Paired with the new law requiring large commercial waste generators to collect food scraps and yard trimmings for composting or anaerobic digestion, this will further build the momentum for organics recycling in California.鈥�
鈥淭his is the kind of landmark legislation composters have been hoping for,鈥� said Neil聽Edgar, Executive Director of the California Compost Coalition. 鈥淭he outcome of these two bills defines a timeline that will lead to the diversion of organic waste from landfills which our industry members can literally take to the bank, enabling the infrastructure development California sorely needs to meet our climate change goals while moving farther down the road to zero waste.鈥�
“These landmark policies are a major step towards creating good jobs in recycling and composting. With these policies in place, Los Angeles is better poised to develop the recycling and composting infrastructure necessary to help us reach our Zero 豆包成人版 goals,” said Jackie Cornejo, Project Director for the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy (LAANE).
鈥淭丑别se two bills are a big huge step forward for bioenergy in California,” said Julia聽Levin, Executive Director of the Bioenergy Association of California. 聽“Together, they will help California to produce millions of gallons of the lowest carbon fuels in existence and to generate hundreds of megawatts of clean, renewable electricity, instead of throwing organic waste in landfills.”
AB 1826 targets the lowest hanging fruit of the organic waste stream鈥攖he material thrown away by the state鈥檚 businesses. Restaurants, super markets, large venues, and food processors generate significant quantities of high quality food waste, and several states have already prohibited the disposal of this material. The bill lays out a measured phase-in of a commercial organics recycling program that will ensure that private sector can build the infrastructure necessary to handle the material. AB 1826 builds on the success of the mandatory commercial recycling program established by AB 341. Beginning with the largest generators of food waste in 2016 and ramping down to the vast majority of businesses over several years, AB 1826 bill will require businesses to sign up for organics recycling service. AB 1594 is the culmination of a two-decade long fight over the very meaning of recycling in California. The bill finally overturns a 1996 law that allowed landfilled yard waste to count as being 鈥渄iverted鈥� from landfills, a practice that served as a major competitor to the true recycling of this material through composting and anaerobic digestion. Landfills are required to be covered at the end of each working day to reduce odor and vector impacts, and California allows yard trimming to be used for this purpose in lieu of traditional soil cover. By counting this practice towards a local government鈥檚 recycling requirements, this policy had created a perverse incentive to landfill green materials instead of recovering the material and returning it to the soil through composting. When residents take the effort to separate their yard trimmings into a separate container, they expect that material to be composted, but they are likely unaware that that material might be sent to the same landfill as their garbage. 聽This fundamentally weakened the integrity of California鈥檚 recycling goals and undercuts true recovery.
For more information, visit聽.